Which type of guardian is typically preferred by the court when a family member is available and willing?

The type of guardian typically preferred by the court when a family member is available and willing is the family guardian. Courts generally prioritize family involvement in guardianship arrangements because family members often have a deeper understanding of the individual's needs, values, and preferences. This familial connection can foster a more personalized and compassionate approach to care, enhancing the well-being of the person under guardianship.

Family guardians are likely to have established relationships with the individual, which can contribute to better decision-making that aligns with the person's best interests. Additionally, courts tend to prefer minimizing disruptions in the individual's life, and a family guardian can often provide continuity of care.

In contrast, corporate guardians are professional services that manage guardianships and may lack the personal connection with the individual. Emergency guardians are appointed in urgent situations, usually for short-term needs, which may not permit the involvement of a willing family member. A guardian ad litem serves a different role, representing the interests of the individual in legal proceedings, and is not a guardian responsible for decisions on their behalf.